China’s First Ban on RWA: 7 Agencies Launch Major Crypto Crackdown Since 2021

1 min read

Beijing Pulls the Plug: Ant and JD Halt Hong Kong Stablecoins

Comprehensive Crypto Crackdown in China

Seven prominent financial industry associations in China have collectively issued a significant risk warning, marking the most extensive crackdown on cryptocurrency since the nationwide prohibition in 2021 that forced all crypto exchanges to exit the market. These associations encompass various sectors, including banking, securities, funds, futures, payment processing, publicly listed companies, and internet finance. They declared that all activities related to cryptocurrencies, such as stablecoins, airdrops, mining, and particularly the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA), are deemed illegal within the country.

RWA Tokenization Faces Regulatory Scrutiny

The warning, made public on December 5, clearly stated that no real-world asset tokenization activities have received approval from Chinese financial authorities, marking the first official ban on RWA in China. A researcher noted that the last time this coalition convened was on September 24, 2021, when ten government departments issued a directive aimed at further mitigating the risks associated with virtual currency trading speculation. This earlier move led to the closure of all cryptocurrency exchanges and mining operations in China, resulting in a drastic drop in the country’s Bitcoin hashrate from 75% of the global total.

Concerns Over Capital Flight and Enforcement Measures

This crackdown occurs as the global market for RWA tokenization exceeds $30 billion, with major entities like BlackRock’s $2 billion BUIDL fund—tokenized by Securitize and used as collateral on platforms such as Binance, Crypto.com, and Deribit—paving the way for mainstream acceptance. Chinese regulators are evidently apprehensive that RWA tokenization could facilitate capital flight, enabling individuals to convert domestic assets into tokens, transfer them offshore, and exchange them for foreign currencies, thus circumventing traditional banking and foreign exchange regulations.

Strengthening Enforcement Through Collaborative Efforts

The statement reiterated that virtual currencies, including stablecoins and tokens such as Pi coin, hold no legal standing and cannot be circulated within China. Both individuals and organizations are prohibited from issuing, exchanging, or raising funds through RWAs or virtual currencies within mainland China, including scenarios where offshore firms employ personnel located in the country. This coordinated initiative follows the People’s Bank of China’s meeting with high-ranking government officials on November 28, during which authorities classified stablecoins as virtual currencies subject to legal action.

Growing Concerns Over Money Laundering

A report released in December highlighted a 37% increase in money laundering activities involving virtual assets on a year-over-year basis, emphasizing the need for stringent enforcement measures. Analysts have described the joint statement from the seven associations as creating a “four-layer blockade.” This includes severing mining infrastructure, obstructing stablecoin payment mechanisms, closing off RWA avenues, and dismantling fraudulent schemes like Pi Network. Furthermore, the warning delineates a distinct separation from Hong Kong’s more lenient stance on cryptocurrencies, indicating that “mainland staff of offshore virtual currency service providers” will face legal repercussions. In contrast, China has been promoting the digital yuan (e-CNY) as an officially sanctioned alternative.

Youth Discontent and Online Reactions

The ban has ignited intense discussions online, particularly among younger investors who feel marginalized from global cryptocurrency prospects. An analysis by BigNews has shed light on the discontent among youth, fueled by aspirations for rapid wealth accumulation amid Bitcoin’s recent surge and the crypto-friendly regulations in the United States. Conversations within online communities reflect disappointment over the discrepancy in policy between China and Western nations, with critics arguing that blanket bans hinder innovation while failing to protect legitimate investors.